When attachment does not occur when someone gives flowers and no abhorrence occurs when someone throws stones — that is considered equanimity.
When attachment does not occur when someone gives flowers and no abhorrence occurs when someone throws stones — that is considered equanimity.
When attachment does not occur when someone gives flowers and no abhorrence occurs when someone throws stones — that is considered equanimity.
When attachment does not occur when someone gives flowers and no abhorrence occurs when someone throws stones — that is considered equanimity.
When attachment does not occur when someone gives flowers and no abhorrence occurs when someone throws stones — that is considered equanimity.
When attachment does not occur when someone gives flowers and no abhorrence occurs when someone throws stones — that is considered equanimity.
When attachment does not occur when someone gives flowers and no abhorrence occurs when someone throws stones — that is considered equanimity.
When attachment does not occur when someone gives flowers and no abhorrence occurs when someone throws stones — that is considered equanimity.
When attachment does not occur when someone gives flowers and no abhorrence occurs when someone throws stones — that is considered equanimity.
When attachment does not occur when someone gives flowers and no abhorrence occurs when someone throws stones — that is considered equanimity.
When attachment does not occur when someone gives flowers and no abhorrence occurs when someone throws stones — that is considered equanimity.
When attachment does not occur when someone gives flowers and no abhorrence occurs when someone throws stones — that is considered equanimity.
When attachment does not occur when someone gives flowers and no abhorrence occurs when someone throws stones — that is considered equanimity.
When attachment does not occur when someone gives flowers and no abhorrence occurs when someone throws stones — that is considered equanimity.
When attachment does not occur when someone gives flowers and no abhorrence occurs when someone throws stones — that is considered equanimity.
When attachment does not occur when someone gives flowers and no abhorrence occurs when someone throws stones — that is considered equanimity.
When attachment does not occur when someone gives flowers and no abhorrence occurs when someone throws stones — that is considered equanimity.
When attachment does not occur when someone gives flowers and no abhorrence occurs when someone throws stones — that is considered equanimity.
When attachment does not occur when someone gives flowers and no abhorrence occurs when someone throws stones — that is considered equanimity.
When attachment does not occur when someone gives flowers and no abhorrence occurs when someone throws stones — that is considered equanimity.
When attachment does not occur when someone gives flowers and no abhorrence occurs when someone throws stones — that is considered equanimity.
When attachment does not occur when someone gives flowers and no abhorrence occurs when someone throws stones — that is considered equanimity.
When attachment does not occur when someone gives flowers and no abhorrence occurs when someone throws stones — that is considered equanimity.
When attachment does not occur when someone gives flowers and no abhorrence occurs when someone throws stones — that is considered equanimity.
When attachment does not occur when someone gives flowers and no abhorrence occurs when someone throws stones — that is considered equanimity.
When attachment does not occur when someone gives flowers and no abhorrence occurs when someone throws stones — that is considered equanimity.
When attachment does not occur when someone gives flowers and no abhorrence occurs when someone throws stones — that is considered equanimity.
When attachment does not occur when someone gives flowers and no abhorrence occurs when someone throws stones — that is considered equanimity.
When attachment does not occur when someone gives flowers and no abhorrence occurs when someone throws stones — that is considered equanimity.
When attachment does not occur when someone gives flowers and no abhorrence occurs when someone throws stones — that is considered equanimity.
Download Customize

When attachment does not occur when someone gives flowers and no abhorrence occurs when someone throws stones

— that is considered equanimity.
Pin Share Tweet Telegram
Topics
dada bhagwan

More “Dada bhagwan” Quotes

Whatever one does without the right belief (samkit - Self-realization) will lead to karmic bondage. Even when he gives t — it is all karma bondage.
We need to become sidha (straightforward) — there is no need to become a sadhu (ascetic).
Seeing the faults of others is indeed an echo of our own fault — the biggest fault is our own fault. That is known as the mad ego.
I am unable to tolerate’ — to say this is the lack of ability to tolerate and ‘I am able to tolerate’ is itself the ability to tolerate.
One binds the worldly life with bad thoughts — one binds the worldly life with good thoughts. With the absence of thoughts (avichaar) there is moksha [liberation].
Not to be able to find one’s ‘own’ faults — this is called the world.
The person performing the experiment becomes the object of the experiment himself — this is known as the illusion!
Physical pleasures are not associated with attachment-abhorrence — the belief in an opinion itself is attachment-abhorrence.
Being dependent on this world will lead to betrayal. It will deceive us at the right time. It is better to depend on a p — at least it will not move away from us at the right time. The one that is living will move away.
One has to attain an ego-less state (nir-ahankari) — attaining a nir-maani state (a desire-free state that wants importance from others) is not enough. The egoism one has of being nir-mani is very subtle. The external ‘horns’ are worn down but the internal ones still remain. The inner ‘horns’ will cause an internal biting.
If you do darshan (worship) of the one who has both stillness in his eyes and chit prasannta (blissful state of chit) — you gain benefit.
There are no places in this world where the chit can be concentrated. Without the chit attaining steady-state — the chit can’t be blissful. There are places where the mind can attain a steady state but there are no places where chit’s steady-state can be attained.