If women have failed to make “universal” art because we’re trapped within the “personal,” why not universalize the “pers — Chris Kraus
If women have failed to make “universal” art because we’re trapped within the “personal,” why not universalize the “pers — Chris Kraus
If women have failed to make “universal” art because we’re trapped within the “personal,” why not universalize the “pers — Chris Kraus
If women have failed to make “universal” art because we’re trapped within the “personal,” why not universalize the “pers — Chris Kraus
If women have failed to make “universal” art because we’re trapped within the “personal,” why not universalize the “pers — Chris Kraus
If women have failed to make “universal” art because we’re trapped within the “personal,” why not universalize the “pers — Chris Kraus
If women have failed to make “universal” art because we’re trapped within the “personal,” why not universalize the “pers — Chris Kraus
If women have failed to make “universal” art because we’re trapped within the “personal,” why not universalize the “pers — Chris Kraus
If women have failed to make “universal” art because we’re trapped within the “personal,” why not universalize the “pers — Chris Kraus
If women have failed to make “universal” art because we’re trapped within the “personal,” why not universalize the “pers — Chris Kraus
If women have failed to make “universal” art because we’re trapped within the “personal,” why not universalize the “pers — Chris Kraus
If women have failed to make “universal” art because we’re trapped within the “personal,” why not universalize the “pers — Chris Kraus
If women have failed to make “universal” art because we’re trapped within the “personal,” why not universalize the “pers — Chris Kraus
If women have failed to make “universal” art because we’re trapped within the “personal,” why not universalize the “pers — Chris Kraus
If women have failed to make “universal” art because we’re trapped within the “personal,” why not universalize the “pers — Chris Kraus
If women have failed to make “universal” art because we’re trapped within the “personal,” why not universalize the “pers — Chris Kraus
If women have failed to make “universal” art because we’re trapped within the “personal,” why not universalize the “pers — Chris Kraus
If women have failed to make “universal” art because we’re trapped within the “personal,” why not universalize the “pers — Chris Kraus
If women have failed to make “universal” art because we’re trapped within the “personal,” why not universalize the “pers — Chris Kraus
If women have failed to make “universal” art because we’re trapped within the “personal,” why not universalize the “pers — Chris Kraus
If women have failed to make “universal” art because we’re trapped within the “personal,” why not universalize the “pers — Chris Kraus
If women have failed to make “universal” art because we’re trapped within the “personal,” why not universalize the “pers — Chris Kraus
If women have failed to make “universal” art because we’re trapped within the “personal,” why not universalize the “pers — Chris Kraus
If women have failed to make “universal” art because we’re trapped within the “personal,” why not universalize the “pers — Chris Kraus
If women have failed to make “universal” art because we’re trapped within the “personal,” why not universalize the “pers — Chris Kraus
If women have failed to make “universal” art because we’re trapped within the “personal,” why not universalize the “pers — Chris Kraus
If women have failed to make “universal” art because we’re trapped within the “personal,” why not universalize the “pers — Chris Kraus
If women have failed to make “universal” art because we’re trapped within the “personal,” why not universalize the “pers — Chris Kraus
If women have failed to make “universal” art because we’re trapped within the “personal,” why not universalize the “pers — Chris Kraus
If women have failed to make “universal” art because we’re trapped within the “personal,” why not universalize the “pers — Chris Kraus
Download Customize

If women have failed to make “universal” art because we’re trapped within the “personal,” why not universalize the “personal” and make it the subject of our art?

— Chris Kraus
Pin Share Tweet Telegram
Topics
art feminism

More “Art” Quotes

IThe epiphany in this thought is that we simply cannot and do not create in isolation. As I paint my blank canvas others — Bella Vespira
The painter knew that color was not something you controlled but something you set free. He believed that color knew its — Thomas Lloyd Qualls, Waking Up at Rembrandt's
As a soul, you have the freedom – and earned responsibility – to transpose your personal process of evolution, to manife — Darrell Calkins
Writing is a form of art. Do not use New Times Roman or Arial because it's boring and hackneyed. — Natalya Vorobyova
We can create transcending stories for readers and for us. Creativity is a double edge sword, which can kill the writer. — Rossana Condoleo
Deal resistance a death blow and make sweet love to your art all night long. Put on your fishnet thigh highs and your pa — Jeanette LeBlanc
I am an artist. Any artist knows that their creations, their pieces must express an array of human emotion and experienc — Solange nicole
All creative work begins as play. The more one plays, the better one works. — Marty Rubin
In the example of the navigator, no writing was essential to draw the meaning of observing the object at a distance from — Anuradha Bhattacharyya, The Lacanian Author
At first the creative mind submits to its entry into the symbolic register and gets itself structured like everyone else — Anuradha Bhattacharyya, The Lacanian Author
The whole world is like an opened candy jar, and we're plunging in for the best treats — Vicki Alayne Bradley, Finding Home: A Creative Journey on a Trip Around the World
Practical utility, however, is not the ultimate purpose of a liberal arts education. Its ultimate purpose is to help you — William Deresiewicz, Excellent Sheep: The Miseducation of the American Elite and the Way to a Meaningful Life