Scientists have no proof that life was not the result of an act of creation, but they are driven by the nature of their — Robert Jastrow, The Enchanted Loom
Scientists have no proof that life was not the result of an act of creation, but they are driven by the nature of their — Robert Jastrow, The Enchanted Loom
Scientists have no proof that life was not the result of an act of creation, but they are driven by the nature of their — Robert Jastrow, The Enchanted Loom
Scientists have no proof that life was not the result of an act of creation, but they are driven by the nature of their — Robert Jastrow, The Enchanted Loom
Scientists have no proof that life was not the result of an act of creation, but they are driven by the nature of their — Robert Jastrow, The Enchanted Loom
Scientists have no proof that life was not the result of an act of creation, but they are driven by the nature of their — Robert Jastrow, The Enchanted Loom
Scientists have no proof that life was not the result of an act of creation, but they are driven by the nature of their — Robert Jastrow, The Enchanted Loom
Scientists have no proof that life was not the result of an act of creation, but they are driven by the nature of their — Robert Jastrow, The Enchanted Loom
Scientists have no proof that life was not the result of an act of creation, but they are driven by the nature of their — Robert Jastrow, The Enchanted Loom
Scientists have no proof that life was not the result of an act of creation, but they are driven by the nature of their — Robert Jastrow, The Enchanted Loom
Scientists have no proof that life was not the result of an act of creation, but they are driven by the nature of their — Robert Jastrow, The Enchanted Loom
Scientists have no proof that life was not the result of an act of creation, but they are driven by the nature of their — Robert Jastrow, The Enchanted Loom
Scientists have no proof that life was not the result of an act of creation, but they are driven by the nature of their — Robert Jastrow, The Enchanted Loom
Scientists have no proof that life was not the result of an act of creation, but they are driven by the nature of their — Robert Jastrow, The Enchanted Loom
Scientists have no proof that life was not the result of an act of creation, but they are driven by the nature of their — Robert Jastrow, The Enchanted Loom
Scientists have no proof that life was not the result of an act of creation, but they are driven by the nature of their — Robert Jastrow, The Enchanted Loom
Scientists have no proof that life was not the result of an act of creation, but they are driven by the nature of their — Robert Jastrow, The Enchanted Loom
Scientists have no proof that life was not the result of an act of creation, but they are driven by the nature of their — Robert Jastrow, The Enchanted Loom
Scientists have no proof that life was not the result of an act of creation, but they are driven by the nature of their — Robert Jastrow, The Enchanted Loom
Scientists have no proof that life was not the result of an act of creation, but they are driven by the nature of their — Robert Jastrow, The Enchanted Loom
Scientists have no proof that life was not the result of an act of creation, but they are driven by the nature of their — Robert Jastrow, The Enchanted Loom
Scientists have no proof that life was not the result of an act of creation, but they are driven by the nature of their — Robert Jastrow, The Enchanted Loom
Scientists have no proof that life was not the result of an act of creation, but they are driven by the nature of their — Robert Jastrow, The Enchanted Loom
Scientists have no proof that life was not the result of an act of creation, but they are driven by the nature of their — Robert Jastrow, The Enchanted Loom
Scientists have no proof that life was not the result of an act of creation, but they are driven by the nature of their — Robert Jastrow, The Enchanted Loom
Scientists have no proof that life was not the result of an act of creation, but they are driven by the nature of their — Robert Jastrow, The Enchanted Loom
Scientists have no proof that life was not the result of an act of creation, but they are driven by the nature of their — Robert Jastrow, The Enchanted Loom
Scientists have no proof that life was not the result of an act of creation, but they are driven by the nature of their — Robert Jastrow, The Enchanted Loom
Scientists have no proof that life was not the result of an act of creation, but they are driven by the nature of their — Robert Jastrow, The Enchanted Loom
Scientists have no proof that life was not the result of an act of creation, but they are driven by the nature of their — Robert Jastrow, The Enchanted Loom
Download Customize

Scientists have no proof that life was not the result of an act of creation, but they are driven by the nature of their profession to seek explanations for the origin of life that lie within the boundaries of natural law.

— Robert Jastrow, The Enchanted Loom
Pin Share Tweet Telegram
Topics
atheism bible big bang theory in creation creationism god physics science

More “Atheism” Quotes

The central thesis of Surnaturel, then, is that, neither in patristic nor in medieval theology, and certainly not in Tho — Fergus Kerr, Twentieth-Century Catholic Theologians: From Neoscholasticism to Nuptial Mysticism
What we fail to realize is we often become like Pharisees in our ruthless attempts to identify Pharisees (and impostors) — Criss Jami, Healology
I don't have any relationship with God and I've never wanted it. I don't believe in fate or in any superior entity; if a — Fernando Alonso Díaz
I once had a published written debate with a religious apologist who, after I had argued the standard line that the idea — A.C. Grayling, The God Argument: The Case against Religion and for Humanism
Religion is an insult to human dignity. With or without religion, you would have good people doing good things and evil — Steven Weinberg
I am an Agnostic because I am not afraid to think. I am not afraid of any god in the universe who would send me or any o — Clarence Darrow
[Religion is] a fantasy [and is] completely empty of any explanatory content. It is also evil. — Peter Atkins
Evil…doesn’t mean doing things that have bad consequences for people. It means private thoughts and actions that are not — Richard Dawkins, The God Delusion
People see the cleverness of nature and suppose it's the cleverness of the animal itself but it was obvious to me that e — Poppy Adams
The only differences between a cult and a religion are the numbers of adherents and the degree to which they are margina — Sam Harris, Waking Up: A Guide to Spirituality Without Religion
Now I have to say I'm a complete atheist, I have no religious views myself and no spiritual views, except very watered d — David J. Chalmers
The spectacle of what is called religion, or at any rate organised religion, in India and elsewhere, has filled me with — Jawaharlal Nehru