Whenever explaining an event, we must choose from three competing modes of explanation. These are regularity, chance, an — William A. Dembski, The Design Inference: Eliminating Chance Through Small Probabilities
Whenever explaining an event, we must choose from three competing modes of explanation. These are regularity, chance, an — William A. Dembski, The Design Inference: Eliminating Chance Through Small Probabilities
Whenever explaining an event, we must choose from three competing modes of explanation. These are regularity, chance, an — William A. Dembski, The Design Inference: Eliminating Chance Through Small Probabilities
Whenever explaining an event, we must choose from three competing modes of explanation. These are regularity, chance, an — William A. Dembski, The Design Inference: Eliminating Chance Through Small Probabilities
Whenever explaining an event, we must choose from three competing modes of explanation. These are regularity, chance, an — William A. Dembski, The Design Inference: Eliminating Chance Through Small Probabilities
Whenever explaining an event, we must choose from three competing modes of explanation. These are regularity, chance, an — William A. Dembski, The Design Inference: Eliminating Chance Through Small Probabilities
Whenever explaining an event, we must choose from three competing modes of explanation. These are regularity, chance, an — William A. Dembski, The Design Inference: Eliminating Chance Through Small Probabilities
Whenever explaining an event, we must choose from three competing modes of explanation. These are regularity, chance, an — William A. Dembski, The Design Inference: Eliminating Chance Through Small Probabilities
Whenever explaining an event, we must choose from three competing modes of explanation. These are regularity, chance, an — William A. Dembski, The Design Inference: Eliminating Chance Through Small Probabilities
Whenever explaining an event, we must choose from three competing modes of explanation. These are regularity, chance, an — William A. Dembski, The Design Inference: Eliminating Chance Through Small Probabilities
Whenever explaining an event, we must choose from three competing modes of explanation. These are regularity, chance, an — William A. Dembski, The Design Inference: Eliminating Chance Through Small Probabilities
Whenever explaining an event, we must choose from three competing modes of explanation. These are regularity, chance, an — William A. Dembski, The Design Inference: Eliminating Chance Through Small Probabilities
Whenever explaining an event, we must choose from three competing modes of explanation. These are regularity, chance, an — William A. Dembski, The Design Inference: Eliminating Chance Through Small Probabilities
Whenever explaining an event, we must choose from three competing modes of explanation. These are regularity, chance, an — William A. Dembski, The Design Inference: Eliminating Chance Through Small Probabilities
Whenever explaining an event, we must choose from three competing modes of explanation. These are regularity, chance, an — William A. Dembski, The Design Inference: Eliminating Chance Through Small Probabilities
Whenever explaining an event, we must choose from three competing modes of explanation. These are regularity, chance, an — William A. Dembski, The Design Inference: Eliminating Chance Through Small Probabilities
Whenever explaining an event, we must choose from three competing modes of explanation. These are regularity, chance, an — William A. Dembski, The Design Inference: Eliminating Chance Through Small Probabilities
Whenever explaining an event, we must choose from three competing modes of explanation. These are regularity, chance, an — William A. Dembski, The Design Inference: Eliminating Chance Through Small Probabilities
Whenever explaining an event, we must choose from three competing modes of explanation. These are regularity, chance, an — William A. Dembski, The Design Inference: Eliminating Chance Through Small Probabilities
Whenever explaining an event, we must choose from three competing modes of explanation. These are regularity, chance, an — William A. Dembski, The Design Inference: Eliminating Chance Through Small Probabilities
Whenever explaining an event, we must choose from three competing modes of explanation. These are regularity, chance, an — William A. Dembski, The Design Inference: Eliminating Chance Through Small Probabilities
Whenever explaining an event, we must choose from three competing modes of explanation. These are regularity, chance, an — William A. Dembski, The Design Inference: Eliminating Chance Through Small Probabilities
Whenever explaining an event, we must choose from three competing modes of explanation. These are regularity, chance, an — William A. Dembski, The Design Inference: Eliminating Chance Through Small Probabilities
Whenever explaining an event, we must choose from three competing modes of explanation. These are regularity, chance, an — William A. Dembski, The Design Inference: Eliminating Chance Through Small Probabilities
Whenever explaining an event, we must choose from three competing modes of explanation. These are regularity, chance, an — William A. Dembski, The Design Inference: Eliminating Chance Through Small Probabilities
Whenever explaining an event, we must choose from three competing modes of explanation. These are regularity, chance, an — William A. Dembski, The Design Inference: Eliminating Chance Through Small Probabilities
Whenever explaining an event, we must choose from three competing modes of explanation. These are regularity, chance, an — William A. Dembski, The Design Inference: Eliminating Chance Through Small Probabilities
Whenever explaining an event, we must choose from three competing modes of explanation. These are regularity, chance, an — William A. Dembski, The Design Inference: Eliminating Chance Through Small Probabilities
Whenever explaining an event, we must choose from three competing modes of explanation. These are regularity, chance, an — William A. Dembski, The Design Inference: Eliminating Chance Through Small Probabilities
Whenever explaining an event, we must choose from three competing modes of explanation. These are regularity, chance, an — William A. Dembski, The Design Inference: Eliminating Chance Through Small Probabilities
Download Customize

Whenever explaining an event, we must choose from three competing modes of explanation. These are regularity, chance, and design... To attribute an event to design is to say that it cannot reasonably be referred to either regularity or chance.

— William A. Dembski, The Design Inference: Eliminating Chance Through Small Probabilities
Pin Share Tweet Telegram
Topics
biology id intelligent design science

More “Biology” Quotes

Our entire neurobiology acts as a giant input-output system, that receives information from the outside world, processes — Abhijit Naskar, What is Mind?
I told my three sons stories about germs more than fifty years ago as fanciful bedtime tales. — Arthur Kornberg
Human experience is not nest and orderly, ready to be coded into predetermined categories. Real life is messy — Jennifer Gold, Undiscovered Country
Men write more books. Men give more lectures. Men ask more questions after lectures. Men post more e-mail to Internet di — Geoffrey Miller, The Mating Mind: How Sexual Choice Shaped the Evolution of Human Nature
In order to approximate those shapes and attitudes which are considered normal and desirable, both sexes deform themselv — Germaine Greer, The Female Eunuch
...because the great beauty of embryo development, the bit that human beings find so hard to grasp, is that it is a tota — Matt Ridley
The offspring cannot rely on its parents for disinterested guidance. One expects the offspring to be preprogrammed to re — Robert Trivers, Social Evolution
Healthy brains create a healthy society. — Abhijit Naskar, I Am The Thread: My Mission
If, again, the most superficial introspection teaches the physiologist that his conscious life is dependent upon the mec — Samuel Butler, Unconscious Memory
Throughout history we humans have struggled to find meaning in the awesome contradiction of our human condition. Neither — Jeremy Griffith, Is It To Be: Terminal Alienation or Transformation For The Human Race
It is difficult to overstate the importance of understanding mirror neurons and their function. They may well be central — V.S. Ramachandran, The Tell–Tale Brain – A Neuroscientist`s Quest for What Makes Us Human
The suggestion that the normal human brain has an almost infinite capacity is important: it means that almost everyone i — Julie Cotton, The Theory of Learning: An Introduction