Energy defines life not flesh and blood. WE are infinite energies experiencing infinity. Through a finite aperture. — Stanley Victor Paskavich
Energy defines life not flesh and blood. WE are infinite energies experiencing infinity. Through a finite aperture. — Stanley Victor Paskavich
Energy defines life not flesh and blood. WE are infinite energies experiencing infinity. Through a finite aperture. — Stanley Victor Paskavich
Energy defines life not flesh and blood. WE are infinite energies experiencing infinity. Through a finite aperture. — Stanley Victor Paskavich
Energy defines life not flesh and blood. WE are infinite energies experiencing infinity. Through a finite aperture. — Stanley Victor Paskavich
Download Customize

Energy defines life not flesh and blood. WE are infinite energies experiencing infinity. Through a finite aperture.

— Stanley Victor Paskavich
Pin Share Tweet Telegram
Topics
metaphysics

More “Metaphysics” Quotes

What is this slow blue dream of living, and this fevered death by dreaming? — Aberjhani, Journey through the Power of the Rainbow: Quotations from a Life Made Out of Poetry
In the pragmatist, streetwise climate of advanced postmodern capitalism, with its scepticism of big pictures and grand n — Terry Eagleton, The Meaning of Life
In meetings philosophy might work,on the field practicality works. — Amit Kalantri
Zsoronga, Sorweel was beginning to realize, possessed the enviable ability to yoke his conviction to his need — to belie — R. Scott Bakker, The White Luck Warrior
The unity of scientific and spiritual knowledge is realized when each of the particular sciences is organically related — Osman Bakar, Tawhid and Science
Time is the Mind of Space. — Samuel Alexander, Space, Time and Deity: The Gifford Lectures at Glasgow Part One
Rainer Maria Rilke greeted and wrestled with the angels of his Duino Elegies in the solitude of a castle surrounded by w — Aberjhani, The River of Winged Dreams
The most perfect and satisfactory knowledge is that of perception but this is limited to the absolutely particular, to t — Arthur Schopenhauer
To clarify the existentiality of the Self, we take as our ‘natural’ point of departure Dasein’s everyday interpretation — Martin Heidegger
The ‘I’ is a bare consciousness, accompanying all concepts. In the ‘I’, ‘nothing more is represented than a transcendent — Martin Heidegger
But how does it come about that while the ‘I think’ gives Kant a genuine phenomenal starting-point, he cannot exploit it — Martin Heidegger
What is the motive for this ‘fugitive’ way of saying “I”? It is motivated by Dasein’s falling; for as falling, it *flees — Martin Heidegger