The question of commonsense is always "what is it good for?" - a question which would abolish the rose and be answered t — James Russell Lowell
The question of commonsense is always "what is it good for?" - a question which would abolish the rose and be answered t — James Russell Lowell
The question of commonsense is always "what is it good for?" - a question which would abolish the rose and be answered t — James Russell Lowell
The question of commonsense is always "what is it good for?" - a question which would abolish the rose and be answered t — James Russell Lowell
The question of commonsense is always "what is it good for?" - a question which would abolish the rose and be answered t — James Russell Lowell
The question of commonsense is always "what is it good for?" - a question which would abolish the rose and be answered t — James Russell Lowell
The question of commonsense is always "what is it good for?" - a question which would abolish the rose and be answered t — James Russell Lowell
The question of commonsense is always "what is it good for?" - a question which would abolish the rose and be answered t — James Russell Lowell
The question of commonsense is always "what is it good for?" - a question which would abolish the rose and be answered t — James Russell Lowell
The question of commonsense is always "what is it good for?" - a question which would abolish the rose and be answered t — James Russell Lowell
The question of commonsense is always "what is it good for?" - a question which would abolish the rose and be answered t — James Russell Lowell
The question of commonsense is always "what is it good for?" - a question which would abolish the rose and be answered t — James Russell Lowell
The question of commonsense is always "what is it good for?" - a question which would abolish the rose and be answered t — James Russell Lowell
The question of commonsense is always "what is it good for?" - a question which would abolish the rose and be answered t — James Russell Lowell
The question of commonsense is always "what is it good for?" - a question which would abolish the rose and be answered t — James Russell Lowell
The question of commonsense is always "what is it good for?" - a question which would abolish the rose and be answered t — James Russell Lowell
The question of commonsense is always "what is it good for?" - a question which would abolish the rose and be answered t — James Russell Lowell
The question of commonsense is always "what is it good for?" - a question which would abolish the rose and be answered t — James Russell Lowell
The question of commonsense is always "what is it good for?" - a question which would abolish the rose and be answered t — James Russell Lowell
The question of commonsense is always "what is it good for?" - a question which would abolish the rose and be answered t — James Russell Lowell
The question of commonsense is always "what is it good for?" - a question which would abolish the rose and be answered t — James Russell Lowell
The question of commonsense is always "what is it good for?" - a question which would abolish the rose and be answered t — James Russell Lowell
The question of commonsense is always "what is it good for?" - a question which would abolish the rose and be answered t — James Russell Lowell
The question of commonsense is always "what is it good for?" - a question which would abolish the rose and be answered t — James Russell Lowell
The question of commonsense is always "what is it good for?" - a question which would abolish the rose and be answered t — James Russell Lowell
The question of commonsense is always "what is it good for?" - a question which would abolish the rose and be answered t — James Russell Lowell
The question of commonsense is always "what is it good for?" - a question which would abolish the rose and be answered t — James Russell Lowell
The question of commonsense is always "what is it good for?" - a question which would abolish the rose and be answered t — James Russell Lowell
The question of commonsense is always "what is it good for?" - a question which would abolish the rose and be answered t — James Russell Lowell
The question of commonsense is always "what is it good for?" - a question which would abolish the rose and be answered t — James Russell Lowell
Download Customize

The question of commonsense is always "what is it good for?" - a question which would abolish the rose and be answered triumphantly by the cabbage.

— James Russell Lowell
Pin Share Tweet Telegram
Topics
wisdom

More “Wisdom” Quotes

Why is wisdom so fair? Why is beauty so wise?Because all else is temporary, while beauty and wisdom are the only real an — Vera Nazarian, The Perpetual Calendar of Inspiration
That was one of the inherent flaws of faith. Belief without knowing. But worse yet: belief without action. It could be g — Chris Galford, The Hollow March
Bowden Cable is the sort of honest and dependable operative that is the backbone of SpecOps. They never win commendation — Jasper Fforde, The Eyre Affair
I would rather be wise and than right and ignorant. — Chris Page
To say that death opposes life is just the same as you would say you live the absolute truth. — Sorin Cerin, Wisdom Collection: The Book of Wisdom
I believed in the faith of faith without acknowledging his quality of being an absolute truth. — Sorin Cerin, Wisdom Collection: The Book of Wisdom
Perhaps the excellence of aphorisms consists not so much in the expression of some rare or abstruse sentiment, as in the — Samuel Johnson
Immer wieder behauptete Unwahrheiten werden nicht zu Wahrheiten, sondern, was schlimmer ist, zu Gewohnheiten. — Oliver Hassencamp
Umgangsformen sind Formen, die zunehmend umgangen werden. — Oliver Hassencamp
All you have to do is decide moment by moment which voice you listen to: the Truth of Love or the nightmare of fear. — Dragos Bratasanu, Ph.D.
To love is to communicate, and you can communicate only in truth. Speak the truth, and speak it with love. — Dragos Bratasanu, Ph.D.
Changing the external conditions of your lives - earn more money, be in a better physical shape, have another partner or — Dragos Bratasanu, Ph.D.