If one man challenges a statement and another cannot prove it, it does not necessarily follow that the statement is fals — Ron Brackin
If one man challenges a statement and another cannot prove it, it does not necessarily follow that the statement is fals — Ron Brackin
If one man challenges a statement and another cannot prove it, it does not necessarily follow that the statement is fals — Ron Brackin
If one man challenges a statement and another cannot prove it, it does not necessarily follow that the statement is fals — Ron Brackin
If one man challenges a statement and another cannot prove it, it does not necessarily follow that the statement is fals — Ron Brackin
If one man challenges a statement and another cannot prove it, it does not necessarily follow that the statement is fals — Ron Brackin
If one man challenges a statement and another cannot prove it, it does not necessarily follow that the statement is fals — Ron Brackin
If one man challenges a statement and another cannot prove it, it does not necessarily follow that the statement is fals — Ron Brackin
If one man challenges a statement and another cannot prove it, it does not necessarily follow that the statement is fals — Ron Brackin
If one man challenges a statement and another cannot prove it, it does not necessarily follow that the statement is fals — Ron Brackin
If one man challenges a statement and another cannot prove it, it does not necessarily follow that the statement is fals — Ron Brackin
If one man challenges a statement and another cannot prove it, it does not necessarily follow that the statement is fals — Ron Brackin
If one man challenges a statement and another cannot prove it, it does not necessarily follow that the statement is fals — Ron Brackin
If one man challenges a statement and another cannot prove it, it does not necessarily follow that the statement is fals — Ron Brackin
If one man challenges a statement and another cannot prove it, it does not necessarily follow that the statement is fals — Ron Brackin
If one man challenges a statement and another cannot prove it, it does not necessarily follow that the statement is fals — Ron Brackin
If one man challenges a statement and another cannot prove it, it does not necessarily follow that the statement is fals — Ron Brackin
If one man challenges a statement and another cannot prove it, it does not necessarily follow that the statement is fals — Ron Brackin
If one man challenges a statement and another cannot prove it, it does not necessarily follow that the statement is fals — Ron Brackin
If one man challenges a statement and another cannot prove it, it does not necessarily follow that the statement is fals — Ron Brackin
If one man challenges a statement and another cannot prove it, it does not necessarily follow that the statement is fals — Ron Brackin
If one man challenges a statement and another cannot prove it, it does not necessarily follow that the statement is fals — Ron Brackin
If one man challenges a statement and another cannot prove it, it does not necessarily follow that the statement is fals — Ron Brackin
If one man challenges a statement and another cannot prove it, it does not necessarily follow that the statement is fals — Ron Brackin
If one man challenges a statement and another cannot prove it, it does not necessarily follow that the statement is fals — Ron Brackin
If one man challenges a statement and another cannot prove it, it does not necessarily follow that the statement is fals — Ron Brackin
If one man challenges a statement and another cannot prove it, it does not necessarily follow that the statement is fals — Ron Brackin
If one man challenges a statement and another cannot prove it, it does not necessarily follow that the statement is fals — Ron Brackin
If one man challenges a statement and another cannot prove it, it does not necessarily follow that the statement is fals — Ron Brackin
If one man challenges a statement and another cannot prove it, it does not necessarily follow that the statement is fals — Ron Brackin
Download Customize

If one man challenges a statement and another cannot prove it, it does not necessarily follow that the statement is false.

— Ron Brackin
Pin Share Tweet Telegram
Topics
apologetics fallacies logic the bible

More “Apologetics” Quotes

Some people's theologies come across as blatantly wrong when weighed against what is revealed in Scripture. However God — Criss Jami, Killosophy
What we fail to realize is we often become like Pharisees in our ruthless attempts to identify Pharisees (and impostors) — Criss Jami, Healology
It is neither just the religious, the spiritual, the power-hungry, the evil, the ignorant, the corrupt, the Christian, t — Criss Jami, Killosophy
If Christ be a fraud, he was among the most peculiar yet brilliant of frauds in saying that only he was the way, the tru — Criss Jami, Killosophy
The conscious attempt to be a good person without Christ is as legalistic as an attempt to make it into Heaven through e — Criss Jami, Killosophy
Some words we use all the time are difficult to define when we actually have to think about them. We use the word “evil” — Jon Morrison, Clear Minds & Dirty Feet: A Reason to Hope, a Message to Share
Perhaps it is true that, by some definitions, Satan is more religious than God. Many of the particularly proud sinners a — Criss Jami
The pride of man hopes but to blame God for the evils of the world, and to praise himself for the good. — Criss Jami
One of the bigger mistakes of our time, I suppose, was preaching the demonization of all judgment without teaching how t — Criss Jami, Healology
It can be a good thing if deeper theology, or philosophy, only makes one more uncertain. It may lead to a healthy doubt; — Criss Jami, Killosophy
Philosophy may serve as the bridge between theology and science. All atheism is a philosophy, but not all philosophy is — Criss Jami, Killosophy
Sure, some of us humans might be angry at a sovereign God about Hell, but know that that is about as meaningful as a few — Criss Jami