Modifying Clausewitz’ aphorism—war is the continuation of diplomacy by other means—one could say that in ideologically d — Erik von Kuehnelt-Leddihn, Leftism Revisited: from de Sade and Marx to Hitler and Pol Pot
Modifying Clausewitz’ aphorism—war is the continuation of diplomacy by other means—one could say that in ideologically d — Erik von Kuehnelt-Leddihn, Leftism Revisited: from de Sade and Marx to Hitler and Pol Pot
Modifying Clausewitz’ aphorism—war is the continuation of diplomacy by other means—one could say that in ideologically d — Erik von Kuehnelt-Leddihn, Leftism Revisited: from de Sade and Marx to Hitler and Pol Pot
Modifying Clausewitz’ aphorism—war is the continuation of diplomacy by other means—one could say that in ideologically d — Erik von Kuehnelt-Leddihn, Leftism Revisited: from de Sade and Marx to Hitler and Pol Pot
Modifying Clausewitz’ aphorism—war is the continuation of diplomacy by other means—one could say that in ideologically d — Erik von Kuehnelt-Leddihn, Leftism Revisited: from de Sade and Marx to Hitler and Pol Pot
Modifying Clausewitz’ aphorism—war is the continuation of diplomacy by other means—one could say that in ideologically d — Erik von Kuehnelt-Leddihn, Leftism Revisited: from de Sade and Marx to Hitler and Pol Pot
Modifying Clausewitz’ aphorism—war is the continuation of diplomacy by other means—one could say that in ideologically d — Erik von Kuehnelt-Leddihn, Leftism Revisited: from de Sade and Marx to Hitler and Pol Pot
Modifying Clausewitz’ aphorism—war is the continuation of diplomacy by other means—one could say that in ideologically d — Erik von Kuehnelt-Leddihn, Leftism Revisited: from de Sade and Marx to Hitler and Pol Pot
Modifying Clausewitz’ aphorism—war is the continuation of diplomacy by other means—one could say that in ideologically d — Erik von Kuehnelt-Leddihn, Leftism Revisited: from de Sade and Marx to Hitler and Pol Pot
Modifying Clausewitz’ aphorism—war is the continuation of diplomacy by other means—one could say that in ideologically d — Erik von Kuehnelt-Leddihn, Leftism Revisited: from de Sade and Marx to Hitler and Pol Pot
Modifying Clausewitz’ aphorism—war is the continuation of diplomacy by other means—one could say that in ideologically d — Erik von Kuehnelt-Leddihn, Leftism Revisited: from de Sade and Marx to Hitler and Pol Pot
Modifying Clausewitz’ aphorism—war is the continuation of diplomacy by other means—one could say that in ideologically d — Erik von Kuehnelt-Leddihn, Leftism Revisited: from de Sade and Marx to Hitler and Pol Pot
Modifying Clausewitz’ aphorism—war is the continuation of diplomacy by other means—one could say that in ideologically d — Erik von Kuehnelt-Leddihn, Leftism Revisited: from de Sade and Marx to Hitler and Pol Pot
Modifying Clausewitz’ aphorism—war is the continuation of diplomacy by other means—one could say that in ideologically d — Erik von Kuehnelt-Leddihn, Leftism Revisited: from de Sade and Marx to Hitler and Pol Pot
Modifying Clausewitz’ aphorism—war is the continuation of diplomacy by other means—one could say that in ideologically d — Erik von Kuehnelt-Leddihn, Leftism Revisited: from de Sade and Marx to Hitler and Pol Pot
Modifying Clausewitz’ aphorism—war is the continuation of diplomacy by other means—one could say that in ideologically d — Erik von Kuehnelt-Leddihn, Leftism Revisited: from de Sade and Marx to Hitler and Pol Pot
Modifying Clausewitz’ aphorism—war is the continuation of diplomacy by other means—one could say that in ideologically d — Erik von Kuehnelt-Leddihn, Leftism Revisited: from de Sade and Marx to Hitler and Pol Pot
Modifying Clausewitz’ aphorism—war is the continuation of diplomacy by other means—one could say that in ideologically d — Erik von Kuehnelt-Leddihn, Leftism Revisited: from de Sade and Marx to Hitler and Pol Pot
Modifying Clausewitz’ aphorism—war is the continuation of diplomacy by other means—one could say that in ideologically d — Erik von Kuehnelt-Leddihn, Leftism Revisited: from de Sade and Marx to Hitler and Pol Pot
Modifying Clausewitz’ aphorism—war is the continuation of diplomacy by other means—one could say that in ideologically d — Erik von Kuehnelt-Leddihn, Leftism Revisited: from de Sade and Marx to Hitler and Pol Pot
Modifying Clausewitz’ aphorism—war is the continuation of diplomacy by other means—one could say that in ideologically d — Erik von Kuehnelt-Leddihn, Leftism Revisited: from de Sade and Marx to Hitler and Pol Pot
Modifying Clausewitz’ aphorism—war is the continuation of diplomacy by other means—one could say that in ideologically d — Erik von Kuehnelt-Leddihn, Leftism Revisited: from de Sade and Marx to Hitler and Pol Pot
Modifying Clausewitz’ aphorism—war is the continuation of diplomacy by other means—one could say that in ideologically d — Erik von Kuehnelt-Leddihn, Leftism Revisited: from de Sade and Marx to Hitler and Pol Pot
Modifying Clausewitz’ aphorism—war is the continuation of diplomacy by other means—one could say that in ideologically d — Erik von Kuehnelt-Leddihn, Leftism Revisited: from de Sade and Marx to Hitler and Pol Pot
Modifying Clausewitz’ aphorism—war is the continuation of diplomacy by other means—one could say that in ideologically d — Erik von Kuehnelt-Leddihn, Leftism Revisited: from de Sade and Marx to Hitler and Pol Pot
Modifying Clausewitz’ aphorism—war is the continuation of diplomacy by other means—one could say that in ideologically d — Erik von Kuehnelt-Leddihn, Leftism Revisited: from de Sade and Marx to Hitler and Pol Pot
Modifying Clausewitz’ aphorism—war is the continuation of diplomacy by other means—one could say that in ideologically d — Erik von Kuehnelt-Leddihn, Leftism Revisited: from de Sade and Marx to Hitler and Pol Pot
Modifying Clausewitz’ aphorism—war is the continuation of diplomacy by other means—one could say that in ideologically d — Erik von Kuehnelt-Leddihn, Leftism Revisited: from de Sade and Marx to Hitler and Pol Pot
Modifying Clausewitz’ aphorism—war is the continuation of diplomacy by other means—one could say that in ideologically d — Erik von Kuehnelt-Leddihn, Leftism Revisited: from de Sade and Marx to Hitler and Pol Pot
Modifying Clausewitz’ aphorism—war is the continuation of diplomacy by other means—one could say that in ideologically d — Erik von Kuehnelt-Leddihn, Leftism Revisited: from de Sade and Marx to Hitler and Pol Pot
Download Customize

Modifying Clausewitz’ aphorism—war is the continuation of diplomacy by other means—one could say that in ideologically divided countries civil war is but the continuation of parliamentarism with other means.

— Erik von Kuehnelt-Leddihn, Leftism Revisited: from de Sade and Marx to Hitler and Pol Pot
Pin Share Tweet Telegram
Topics
civil war democracy ideology parliamentarianism spanish civil war

More “Civil war” Quotes

poor boy! I never knew you, Yet I think I could not refuse this moment to die for you, if that would save you — Walt Whitman, Drum Taps
In the years preceding the Civil War in America, Christian ministers wrote nearly half of all defenses of slavery. — Rachel Held Evans, Searching for Sunday: Loving, Leaving, and Finding the Church
War means fighting, and fighting means killing. — Nathan Bedford Forrest
Are you a communist?""No I am an anti-fascist""For a long time?""Since I have understood fascism. — Ernest Hemingway, For Whom the Bell Tolls
I can assure you that no kingdom has ever had as many civil wars as the kingdom of Christ. — Montesquieu, Persian Letters
This isn't to deny that there were fierce arguments, at the time and ever since, about the causes and goals of both the — George Packer
For twenty-five years I've been speaking and writing in defense of your right to happiness in this world, condemning you — Wilhelm Reich, Listen, Little Man!
In trench warfare five things are important: firewood, food, tobacco, candles, and the enemy. In winter on the Zaragoza — George Orwell, Homage to Catalonia
1. Bangladesh.... In 1971 ... Kissinger overrode all advice in order to support the Pakistani generals in both their civ — Christopher Hitchens
The war had been a daily thought, a continual consciousness in her life for two years, but never a real presence. Battle — Elisabeth Grace Foley, War Memorial
We have shared the incommunicable experience of war, we have felt, we still feel, the passion of life to its top. In our — Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr.
We believed that it was most desirable that the North should win, we believed in the principle that the Union is indisso — Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr.