The ratio of feed to flesh in chicken, the most efficient animal by this measure, is two pounds of corn to one of meat, — Michael Pollan, The Omnivore's Dilemma: A Natural History of Four Meals
The ratio of feed to flesh in chicken, the most efficient animal by this measure, is two pounds of corn to one of meat, — Michael Pollan, The Omnivore's Dilemma: A Natural History of Four Meals
The ratio of feed to flesh in chicken, the most efficient animal by this measure, is two pounds of corn to one of meat, — Michael Pollan, The Omnivore's Dilemma: A Natural History of Four Meals
The ratio of feed to flesh in chicken, the most efficient animal by this measure, is two pounds of corn to one of meat, — Michael Pollan, The Omnivore's Dilemma: A Natural History of Four Meals
The ratio of feed to flesh in chicken, the most efficient animal by this measure, is two pounds of corn to one of meat, — Michael Pollan, The Omnivore's Dilemma: A Natural History of Four Meals
The ratio of feed to flesh in chicken, the most efficient animal by this measure, is two pounds of corn to one of meat, — Michael Pollan, The Omnivore's Dilemma: A Natural History of Four Meals
The ratio of feed to flesh in chicken, the most efficient animal by this measure, is two pounds of corn to one of meat, — Michael Pollan, The Omnivore's Dilemma: A Natural History of Four Meals
The ratio of feed to flesh in chicken, the most efficient animal by this measure, is two pounds of corn to one of meat, — Michael Pollan, The Omnivore's Dilemma: A Natural History of Four Meals
The ratio of feed to flesh in chicken, the most efficient animal by this measure, is two pounds of corn to one of meat, — Michael Pollan, The Omnivore's Dilemma: A Natural History of Four Meals
The ratio of feed to flesh in chicken, the most efficient animal by this measure, is two pounds of corn to one of meat, — Michael Pollan, The Omnivore's Dilemma: A Natural History of Four Meals
The ratio of feed to flesh in chicken, the most efficient animal by this measure, is two pounds of corn to one of meat, — Michael Pollan, The Omnivore's Dilemma: A Natural History of Four Meals
The ratio of feed to flesh in chicken, the most efficient animal by this measure, is two pounds of corn to one of meat, — Michael Pollan, The Omnivore's Dilemma: A Natural History of Four Meals
The ratio of feed to flesh in chicken, the most efficient animal by this measure, is two pounds of corn to one of meat, — Michael Pollan, The Omnivore's Dilemma: A Natural History of Four Meals
The ratio of feed to flesh in chicken, the most efficient animal by this measure, is two pounds of corn to one of meat, — Michael Pollan, The Omnivore's Dilemma: A Natural History of Four Meals
The ratio of feed to flesh in chicken, the most efficient animal by this measure, is two pounds of corn to one of meat, — Michael Pollan, The Omnivore's Dilemma: A Natural History of Four Meals
The ratio of feed to flesh in chicken, the most efficient animal by this measure, is two pounds of corn to one of meat, — Michael Pollan, The Omnivore's Dilemma: A Natural History of Four Meals
The ratio of feed to flesh in chicken, the most efficient animal by this measure, is two pounds of corn to one of meat, — Michael Pollan, The Omnivore's Dilemma: A Natural History of Four Meals
The ratio of feed to flesh in chicken, the most efficient animal by this measure, is two pounds of corn to one of meat, — Michael Pollan, The Omnivore's Dilemma: A Natural History of Four Meals
The ratio of feed to flesh in chicken, the most efficient animal by this measure, is two pounds of corn to one of meat, — Michael Pollan, The Omnivore's Dilemma: A Natural History of Four Meals
The ratio of feed to flesh in chicken, the most efficient animal by this measure, is two pounds of corn to one of meat, — Michael Pollan, The Omnivore's Dilemma: A Natural History of Four Meals
The ratio of feed to flesh in chicken, the most efficient animal by this measure, is two pounds of corn to one of meat, — Michael Pollan, The Omnivore's Dilemma: A Natural History of Four Meals
The ratio of feed to flesh in chicken, the most efficient animal by this measure, is two pounds of corn to one of meat, — Michael Pollan, The Omnivore's Dilemma: A Natural History of Four Meals
The ratio of feed to flesh in chicken, the most efficient animal by this measure, is two pounds of corn to one of meat, — Michael Pollan, The Omnivore's Dilemma: A Natural History of Four Meals
The ratio of feed to flesh in chicken, the most efficient animal by this measure, is two pounds of corn to one of meat, — Michael Pollan, The Omnivore's Dilemma: A Natural History of Four Meals
The ratio of feed to flesh in chicken, the most efficient animal by this measure, is two pounds of corn to one of meat, — Michael Pollan, The Omnivore's Dilemma: A Natural History of Four Meals
The ratio of feed to flesh in chicken, the most efficient animal by this measure, is two pounds of corn to one of meat, — Michael Pollan, The Omnivore's Dilemma: A Natural History of Four Meals
The ratio of feed to flesh in chicken, the most efficient animal by this measure, is two pounds of corn to one of meat, — Michael Pollan, The Omnivore's Dilemma: A Natural History of Four Meals
The ratio of feed to flesh in chicken, the most efficient animal by this measure, is two pounds of corn to one of meat, — Michael Pollan, The Omnivore's Dilemma: A Natural History of Four Meals
The ratio of feed to flesh in chicken, the most efficient animal by this measure, is two pounds of corn to one of meat, — Michael Pollan, The Omnivore's Dilemma: A Natural History of Four Meals
The ratio of feed to flesh in chicken, the most efficient animal by this measure, is two pounds of corn to one of meat, — Michael Pollan, The Omnivore's Dilemma: A Natural History of Four Meals
Download Customize

The ratio of feed to flesh in chicken, the most efficient animal by this measure, is two pounds of corn to one of meat, which is why chicken costs less than beef.

— Michael Pollan, The Omnivore's Dilemma: A Natural History of Four Meals
Pin Share Tweet Telegram
Topics
food meatpacking

More “Food” Quotes

I’ve tackled many challenges in my lifetime. The most satisfying ones were food related. Like the 2-pound burger at Fudd — Jake Byrne, First and Goal: What Football Taught Me About Never Giving Up
I won't eat what I can't kill. It seems shoddy, hypocritical. — Jeanette Winterson
Goats' refusal of young blackbrush shoots, furthermore, is outright. They want nothing to do with it. Provenza pointed a — Mark Schatzker, The Dorito Effect: The Surprising New Truth About Food and Flavor
There exists a bastard cuisine that is too often assumed to be real French cooking. — Richard Olney
A six mile meteorite cannot compare with a culinary cataclysm of this magnitude. — Michelle Franklin
I had to piece together a diet for her, too. I knew which combinations of which foods on which days would rehang everyth — Gary Lutz
Good!” the creature echoed. “Doctor Nelson will be along in a minute. Feel like breakfast?”All symbols were in Smith’s v — Robert A. Heinlein
Starla, when you work in a restaurant, it’s not called ‘pie with ice cream on top.’ It’s called pie a la mode. Try sayin — Erin O'Riordan, Cut
The stomach is a slave that must accept everything that is given to it, but which avenges wrongs as slyly as does the sl — Émile Souvestre
...the question of portion size. When I ate Doritos or a Big Mac, I dept on eating and eating, and later experienced McR — Mark Schatzker, The Dorito Effect: The Surprising New Truth About Food and Flavor
Plants are also integral to reweaving the connection between land and people. A place becomes a home when it sustains yo — Robin Wall Kimmerer, Braiding Sweetgrass: Indigenous Wisdom, Scientific Knowledge, and the Teachings of Plants
What you think, what you eat, and what you see today, shapes who you will be tomorrow. — Crystal Woods, Better to be able to love than to be loveable