Language is not the lowborn, gawky servant of thought and feeling; it is need, thought, feeling, and perception itself. — William H. Gass
Language is not the lowborn, gawky servant of thought and feeling; it is need, thought, feeling, and perception itself. — William H. Gass
Language is not the lowborn, gawky servant of thought and feeling; it is need, thought, feeling, and perception itself. — William H. Gass
Language is not the lowborn, gawky servant of thought and feeling; it is need, thought, feeling, and perception itself. — William H. Gass
Language is not the lowborn, gawky servant of thought and feeling; it is need, thought, feeling, and perception itself. — William H. Gass
Language is not the lowborn, gawky servant of thought and feeling; it is need, thought, feeling, and perception itself. — William H. Gass
Language is not the lowborn, gawky servant of thought and feeling; it is need, thought, feeling, and perception itself. — William H. Gass
Language is not the lowborn, gawky servant of thought and feeling; it is need, thought, feeling, and perception itself. — William H. Gass
Language is not the lowborn, gawky servant of thought and feeling; it is need, thought, feeling, and perception itself. — William H. Gass
Language is not the lowborn, gawky servant of thought and feeling; it is need, thought, feeling, and perception itself. — William H. Gass
Language is not the lowborn, gawky servant of thought and feeling; it is need, thought, feeling, and perception itself. — William H. Gass
Language is not the lowborn, gawky servant of thought and feeling; it is need, thought, feeling, and perception itself. — William H. Gass
Language is not the lowborn, gawky servant of thought and feeling; it is need, thought, feeling, and perception itself. — William H. Gass
Language is not the lowborn, gawky servant of thought and feeling; it is need, thought, feeling, and perception itself. — William H. Gass
Language is not the lowborn, gawky servant of thought and feeling; it is need, thought, feeling, and perception itself. — William H. Gass
Language is not the lowborn, gawky servant of thought and feeling; it is need, thought, feeling, and perception itself. — William H. Gass
Language is not the lowborn, gawky servant of thought and feeling; it is need, thought, feeling, and perception itself. — William H. Gass
Language is not the lowborn, gawky servant of thought and feeling; it is need, thought, feeling, and perception itself. — William H. Gass
Language is not the lowborn, gawky servant of thought and feeling; it is need, thought, feeling, and perception itself. — William H. Gass
Language is not the lowborn, gawky servant of thought and feeling; it is need, thought, feeling, and perception itself. — William H. Gass
Language is not the lowborn, gawky servant of thought and feeling; it is need, thought, feeling, and perception itself. — William H. Gass
Language is not the lowborn, gawky servant of thought and feeling; it is need, thought, feeling, and perception itself. — William H. Gass
Language is not the lowborn, gawky servant of thought and feeling; it is need, thought, feeling, and perception itself. — William H. Gass
Language is not the lowborn, gawky servant of thought and feeling; it is need, thought, feeling, and perception itself. — William H. Gass
Language is not the lowborn, gawky servant of thought and feeling; it is need, thought, feeling, and perception itself. — William H. Gass
Language is not the lowborn, gawky servant of thought and feeling; it is need, thought, feeling, and perception itself. — William H. Gass
Language is not the lowborn, gawky servant of thought and feeling; it is need, thought, feeling, and perception itself. — William H. Gass
Language is not the lowborn, gawky servant of thought and feeling; it is need, thought, feeling, and perception itself. — William H. Gass
Language is not the lowborn, gawky servant of thought and feeling; it is need, thought, feeling, and perception itself. — William H. Gass
Language is not the lowborn, gawky servant of thought and feeling; it is need, thought, feeling, and perception itself. — William H. Gass
Download Customize

Language is not the lowborn, gawky servant of thought and feeling; it is need, thought, feeling, and perception itself. The shape of sentences, the song in its syllables, the rhythm of its movement, is the movement of the imagination.

— William H. Gass
Pin Share Tweet Telegram
Topics
language writing

More “Language” Quotes

A word has its use Or like a man it will soon have a grave. — Edward Arlington Robinson
No matter how eloquently a dog may bark he cannot tell you that his parents were poor but honest. — Bertrand Russell
Most people have to talk so they won't hear. — May Sarton
Every utterance is an event and no two events are precisely alike. The extreme view therefore is that no word ever me — Louis B. Saloman
It is with words as with sunbeams. The more they are condensed the deeper they burn. — Robert Southey
If you can teach me a new word I'll walk all the way to China to get it. — Turkish proverb
I have always suspected that correctness is the last refuge of those who have nothing to say. — Friedrich Wasiman
... yes I speak a different language - the dark fire of poetry - it flutters and gutters in tune with the mood... — John Geddes, A Familiar Rain
What does ‘United States of America’ mean? That we’re some states, we’re united somehow, and that we’re in America. Amer — Erin O'Riordan, Cut
When you're five years old, and you're running a business that people did not think there was room for, getting attentio — Brit Hume
Growing up in eastern Turkey, I was not really involved with the family business - sheep and cow farming, yogurt and che — Hamdi Ulukaya
CIOs have earned a strategic seat at the table, but now they've got to hold that seat - and the only way they can do tha — Mark V. Hurd