Texts are not "processed" as much as they are resurrected, and the image of reader and information processor or computer — Sam Wineburg, Historical Thinking and Other Unnatural Acts: Charting the Future of Teaching the Past
Texts are not "processed" as much as they are resurrected, and the image of reader and information processor or computer — Sam Wineburg, Historical Thinking and Other Unnatural Acts: Charting the Future of Teaching the Past
Texts are not "processed" as much as they are resurrected, and the image of reader and information processor or computer — Sam Wineburg, Historical Thinking and Other Unnatural Acts: Charting the Future of Teaching the Past
Texts are not "processed" as much as they are resurrected, and the image of reader and information processor or computer — Sam Wineburg, Historical Thinking and Other Unnatural Acts: Charting the Future of Teaching the Past
Texts are not "processed" as much as they are resurrected, and the image of reader and information processor or computer — Sam Wineburg, Historical Thinking and Other Unnatural Acts: Charting the Future of Teaching the Past
Download Customize

Texts are not "processed" as much as they are resurrected, and the image of reader and information processor or computer device, which often dominates current discussions of reading, seems less apt than another metaphor: the reader as necromancer.

— Sam Wineburg, Historical Thinking and Other Unnatural Acts: Charting the Future of Teaching the Past
Pin Share Tweet Telegram
Topics
cogitation contemplation imagination